More than 50 years of landmark results

Since 1967, Lowey Dannenberg has represented investors and major corporations in complex litigation, recovering billions of dollars on their behalf.

Solutions for Complex Cases

Antitrust

Commodities

Data Privacy

Health Care

Securities

Professional Recommendations

“[Lowey Dannenberg] has considerable experience in litigating ‘some of the largest class actions throughout the country.’ . . . . The quality of their representation is also evidenced by the fact that Class Members, including sophisticated institutional investors, have not objected to the Settlement. The Court has no reason to doubt the quality of their representation.”

Hon. Gregory H. Woods, July 7, 2022 Fairness HearingTranscript, at p. 24 in In re JPMorgan Precious Metals Spoofing Litigation 18 Civ. 10356 (S.D.N.Y.)

“The court appreciates class counsel’s taking on these challenges and class counsel’s able navigation of these hard problems, in developing the case on behalf of the putative class, and in bringing contentious settlement negotiations to a successful outcome.

I might add too that the settlement was not only successful. Compared with many analogous cases, it was also prompt, a fact that brings obvious advantages to the class.”

Hon. Paul Engelmayer, May 31, 2022 Fairness Hearing Transcript, at p. 30 in In re JPMorgan Treasury Spoofing Litigation, 20 Civ. 3515 (S.D.N.Y.)

Recent Cases

UCSF Class Action

Data Breach and Privacy, Existing Cases

By Christian Levis

In Doe v. The Regents of the University of California, No. 3:23-cv-00598 (N.D. Cal.), Lowey Dannenberg represents a class of individuals who used the University of California San Francisco Medical Center (“UCSF”) website to book appointments, search for doctors, or took other action on UCSF’s website.

Read More

Google Assistant Privacy Litigation

Data Breach and Privacy, Data Privacy

By Christian Levis

Lowey serves as co-lead class counsel in this certified class action against Google, alleging that Google’s unlawfully and intentionally recorded Plaintiffs’ and Class Members’ confidential communications without their consent through its Google […]

Read More

Doe v. Google LLC, 5:23-CV-02431 (N.D. Cal.)

Data Privacy

By Christian Levis

Lowey serves as Co-Lead Class Counsel representing Plaintiffs and Class Members alleging that Google collected individuals’ health data through sophisticated tracking technology, including Google Analytics, incorporated on the websites of […]

Read More

News

Blog

Reverse Piercing Of The Corporate Veil In Securities Litigation

Jun 23, 2021

Reverse veil-piercing has become a limited means to remedy fraud and injustice between shareholders and corporations. Reverse piercing of the corporate veil occurs when a claimant seeks to hold a corporation liable for the obligations of an individual shareholder.[1] Instead of holding an…

Have a Case You Think We Can Help With?

Get Our Newsletter