More than 50 years of landmark results
Since 1967, Lowey Dannenberg has represented investors and major corporations in complex litigation, recovering billions of dollars on their behalf.Solutions for Complex Cases
Professional Recommendations
Recent Cases

Roche v. Aetna, Inc.
Healthcare, Notable
Lowey Dannenberg is defending Aetna in a class action related to state anti-subrogation laws. Minerley v. Aetna Inc., et al., 13-cv-1337 (D.N.J.). Lowey Dannenberg has defended and won dismissal of several similar class action lawsuits against health insurance clients: Wurtz v. Rawlings Co., LLC, 2016 WL 7174674 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2016); Meek-Horton v. Trover, et al., 910 F.Supp. 2d 690 (S.D.N.Y. 2013); Potts v. Rawlings Co. LLC, 897 F.Supp. 2d 185 (S.D.N.Y. 2012).

Federated Investment Management Company, et al., v. Republic of Argentina
Antitrust
Lowey obtained emergency injunctive relief on behalf of Federated Investors, one of the largest investment firms in the country with over $363 billion in assets under management, preventing the Government of Argentina from canceling outstanding bonds with a face value of more than $500 million, which had been erroneously tendered by those bondholders. Federated Investment Management Company, et al., v. Republic of Argentina, et al., 10 Civ. 4324 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (Griesa, J.).

Juniper Networks
Notable
Lowey Dannenberg served as lead counsel, representing the New York City Pension Funds and related class members, alleging that Juniper Networks, Inc. fraudulently concealed the backdating of millions of stock options, resulting in a $900 million financial restatement.
News
Lowey Secures Preliminary Approval of $60 Million Settlement in In re JPMorgan Precious Metals Spoofing Litigation
On December 20, 2021, Judge Gregory H. Woods of the United States Court for the Southern District of New York granted preliminary approval of a $60 million dollar settlement in in In re JPMorgan Precious Metals Spoofing Litigation, 18-cv-10356 (S.D.N.Y.). This settlement resolves claims against JPMorgan for the alleged manipulation of the precious metals futures market.
Blog
SEC Revives Claw Back Rule for Executive Compensation
Securities and Exchange Commission voted on October 14, 2021 to bring back an unfinished rule from 2015[1] relating to executive compensation. The rule requires U.S. listed companies to have a plan in place to claw back executive compensation in the event the company corrects their financial…





