More than 50 years of landmark results
Since 1967, Lowey Dannenberg has represented investors and major corporations in complex litigation, recovering billions of dollars on their behalf.Solutions for Complex Cases
Professional Recommendations
Recent Cases
Doe v. Favor, Inc., 3:23-00059 (N.D. Cal.).
Data Breach and Privacy, Data Privacy
Lowey Dannenberg represents a class of Favor (formerly Pill Club) website and app users alleging their personal data, including prescription information relating to birth control and Plan B, were unlawfully […]
Doe. v. Good Rx Holdings, Inc., No. 3:23-cv-00501-AMO (N.D. Cal.)
Data Privacy
Lowey serves as interim co-lead class counsel on behalf of Plaintiffs and Class members alleging that advertisers Google, Meta, and Criteo unlawfully intercepted GoodRx users’ medical information, including prescription information, as a result of GoodRx’s incorporation of its co-defendants’ tracking […]

In re Granulated Sugar Antitrust Litig., No. 24-mdl-3110
Commodities
In Sugar, plaintiffs allege a price fixing and information exchange conspiracy against the largest Sugar producers in the United States. The Court held that our pleadings survived Twombly on both […]
News
Lowey Achieves Landmark Victory as California Jury Finds Meta Liable for Recording Flo Health users’ data
On Friday, August 1st, Lowey Dannenberg achieved a historic victory over Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) when a California jury found that Meta had violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) by recording individuals’ communications with Flo Health, a…
Blog
The Delaware Court of Chancery Finds Justified Fee-Shifting Against a Corporation Based on Egregious Conduct in Books and Records Action
The general rule in the United States justice system, the so-called “American Rule,” is that each party to litigation must pay its own attorney’s fees. The underlying rationale for the rule is that a plaintiff should not be deterred from bringing a meritorious case to court for fear of prohibitive…





