More than 50 years of landmark results
Since 1967, Lowey Dannenberg has represented investors and major corporations in complex litigation, recovering billions of dollars on their behalf.Solutions for Complex Cases
Professional Recommendations
Recent Cases

Roche v. Aetna, Inc.
Healthcare, Notable
Lowey Dannenberg is defending Aetna in a class action related to state anti-subrogation laws. Minerley v. Aetna Inc., et al., 13-cv-1337 (D.N.J.). Lowey Dannenberg has defended and won dismissal of several similar class action lawsuits against health insurance clients: Wurtz v. Rawlings Co., LLC, 2016 WL 7174674 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2016); Meek-Horton v. Trover, et al., 910 F.Supp. 2d 690 (S.D.N.Y. 2013); Potts v. Rawlings Co. LLC, 897 F.Supp. 2d 185 (S.D.N.Y. 2012).

Federated Investment Management Company, et al., v. Republic of Argentina
Antitrust
Lowey obtained emergency injunctive relief on behalf of Federated Investors, one of the largest investment firms in the country with over $363 billion in assets under management, preventing the Government of Argentina from canceling outstanding bonds with a face value of more than $500 million, which had been erroneously tendered by those bondholders. Federated Investment Management Company, et al., v. Republic of Argentina, et al., 10 Civ. 4324 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (Griesa, J.).

Juniper Networks
Notable
Lowey Dannenberg served as lead counsel, representing the New York City Pension Funds and related class members, alleging that Juniper Networks, Inc. fraudulently concealed the backdating of millions of stock options, resulting in a $900 million financial restatement.
News
Lowey Achieves Landmark Victory as California Jury Finds Meta Liable for Recording Flo Health users’ data
On Friday, August 1st, Lowey Dannenberg achieved a historic victory over Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) when a California jury found that Meta had violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”) by recording individuals’ communications with Flo Health, a…
Blog
The Delaware Court of Chancery Finds Justified Fee-Shifting Against a Corporation Based on Egregious Conduct in Books and Records Action
The general rule in the United States justice system, the so-called “American Rule,” is that each party to litigation must pay its own attorney’s fees. The underlying rationale for the rule is that a plaintiff should not be deterred from bringing a meritorious case to court for fear of prohibitive…





