More than 50 years of landmark results
Since 1967, Lowey Dannenberg has represented investors and major corporations in complex litigation, recovering billions of dollars on their behalf.Solutions for Complex Cases
Professional Recommendations
Recent Cases
Doe v. Favor, Inc., 3:23-00059 (N.D. Cal.).
Data Breach and Privacy, Data Privacy
Lowey Dannenberg represents a class of Favor (formerly Pill Club) website and app users alleging their personal data, including prescription information relating to birth control and Plan B, were unlawfully […]
Doe. v. Good Rx Holdings, Inc., No. 3:23-cv-00501-AMO (N.D. Cal.)
Data Privacy
Lowey serves as interim co-lead class counsel on behalf of Plaintiffs and Class members alleging that advertisers Google, Meta, and Criteo unlawfully intercepted GoodRx users’ medical information, including prescription information, as a result of GoodRx’s incorporation of its co-defendants’ tracking […]

In re Granulated Sugar Antitrust Litig., No. 24-mdl-3110
Commodities
In Sugar, plaintiffs allege a price fixing and information exchange conspiracy against the largest Sugar producers in the United States. The Court held that our pleadings survived Twombly on both […]
News
Lowey Secures Settlement with Papa John’s in ‘No-Poaching’ Case
On August 7th, U.S. District Judge Benjamin Beaton approved a preliminary class action settlement with Papa John’s for $5 million for the class. The class consists of over 400,000 former and current Papa John’s employees. The lawsuit alleged that Papa John’s, one of…
Blog
Hiding the Ball: The Implications of the Marketing Rule
On August 23, 1940, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed two bills into law, the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 (the “Investment Act”), both of which were aimed to protect investors from a lack of disclosures. The main goal of the Investment Act was to…





