More than 50 years of landmark results

Since 1967, Lowey Dannenberg has represented investors and major corporations in complex litigation, recovering billions of dollars on their behalf.

Professional Recommendations

“[Lowey Dannenberg] has considerable experience in litigating ‘some of the largest class actions throughout the country.’ . . . . The quality of their representation is also evidenced by the fact that Class Members, including sophisticated institutional investors, have not objected to the Settlement. The Court has no reason to doubt the quality of their representation.”

Hon. Gregory H. Woods, July 7, 2022 Fairness HearingTranscript, at p. 24 in In re JPMorgan Precious Metals Spoofing Litigation 18 Civ. 10356 (S.D.N.Y.)

“The court appreciates class counsel’s taking on these challenges and class counsel’s able navigation of these hard problems, in developing the case on behalf of the putative class, and in bringing contentious settlement negotiations to a successful outcome.

I might add too that the settlement was not only successful. Compared with many analogous cases, it was also prompt, a fact that brings obvious advantages to the class.”

Hon. Paul Engelmayer, May 31, 2022 Fairness Hearing Transcript, at p. 30 in In re JPMorgan Treasury Spoofing Litigation, 20 Civ. 3515 (S.D.N.Y.)

Recent Cases

Australian Bank Bill Swap Reference Rate

Commodities

Lowey Dannenberg filed a proposed class action in August 2016 alleging that global financial institutions responsible for setting the Bank Bill Swap Reference Rate (“BBSW”), the primary interest rate benchmark […]

Sterling LIBOR

Commodities

Lowey Dannenberg filed a proposed class action in May 2015 against global financial institutions responsible for setting the Sterling London Interbank Offered Rate (Sterling LIBOR) for allegedly colluding to manipulate Sterling LIBOR to increase their profits at the expense of investors.

Dollar General

Notable

Lowey Dannenberg is currently prosecuting a shareholder derivative case against Dollar General’s Board of Directors and certain officers for its persistent failure to implement and maintain an effective system of internal controls in violation of their fiduciary duties surrounding workplace safety.

News

Lowey Secures Settlement with Papa John’s in ‘No-Poaching’ Case

On August 7th, U.S. District Judge Benjamin Beaton approved a preliminary class action settlement with Papa John’s for $5 million for the class. The class consists of over 400,000 former and current Papa John’s employees. The lawsuit alleged that Papa John’s, one of…

Blog

Hiding the Ball: The Implications of the Marketing Rule

On August 23, 1940, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed two bills into law, the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 (the “Investment Act”), both of which were aimed to protect investors from a lack of disclosures. The main goal of the Investment Act was to…

Have a Case You Think We Can Help With?